Friday, October 21, 2016

October Book Bites!

October's highly recommended reads....  Enjoy!

by Eric Beetner
I mean, will you just look at this cover?! And the story certainly doesn't disappoint- fast, funny and thrilling on a classic level.
Nothing Short of Dying
by Erik Storey
An atmospheric thrill ride with one of the fastest paces of any novel I've read. The story just keeps on coming for you. 
Be Cool
by Ben Tanzer
Ben Tanzer pretty much speaks for himself, but I'll just add that his "sorta" memoir is my favorite work of his to date. Raw, honest, relatable and addictive- Be Cool was a one day, impossible-to-put-down read.

Red Right Hand
by Chris Holm
And one more thriller for the road. Red Right Hand, with its Hit Man-FBI-Secret Council triangle is not to be missed. And you can read my interview with Chris Holm here.
Cheers and Happy Reading!


Monday, October 10, 2016

Of Angels and Devils: An Interview with Chris Holm, author of Red Right Hand

One of the books I've been talking up a storm about over the past month, in case you hadn't noticed, is Chris Holm's recently released novel Red Right Hand. A classic thriller, Red Right Hand brings together the FBI, a secret Council with a terrorist plot, and a hit man anti-hero with both a mission and a vendetta. It's a wild ride and one which I truly enjoyed. I'm excited and honored, therefore, to bring you an interview with Chris Holm. Read on!

Steph Post: I was initially drawn to your book by its striking cover and its title, which I hoped was a reference to Nick Cave’s song “Red Right Hand.” I was, of course, thrilled to see that you included an excerpt from the song in the epigraph for the novel. Did Cave’s song, or its imagery or themes, in any way influence or guide you as you began to write Red Right Hand?

Chris Holm: Very much so. In The Killing Kind, I introduced the Council, which is essentially a criminal UN comprising representatives from every major organized crime outfit in the country, and the Council’s right-hand man. In Red Right Hand, that man—whose name is Sal Lombino (the birth name of the late, great Ed McBain)—and his machinations on the Council’s behalf take center stage. I envisioned him as a chaos agent, an emissary of evil, the prime mover of a vast criminal conspiracy. Or, as Cave puts it:
You’re one microscopic cog
In his catastrophic plan
Designed and directed by
His red right hand

The phrase “red right hand” didn’t originate with Cave, though. He borrowed it from Milton, who was a huge influence on my Collector series. While Cave’s “Red Right Hand” has a sinister cast, Milton used the term to refer to the wrath of God:
What if the breath that kindl’d those grim fires
Awak’d should blow them into sevenfold rage
And plunge us in the flames? or from above
Should intermitted vengeance arm again
His red right hand to plague us?

The interplay between the two quotes became the central tension of the book. If Lombino was the Devil’s Red Right Hand, what did that make my series character, Michael Hendricks—a reluctant avenging angel?

SP: I was about halfway through Red Right Hand when I realized that The Killing Kind, for which you just recently won the Anthony Award, preceded this work. Red Right Hand is the second installment in a trilogy series, but I found that it worked very well as a stand-alone novel. Would you recommend that readers begin with The Killing Kind to really understand the story and the character of Michael Hendricks?

CH: I’m glad it worked well as a standalone, because I tried hard to ensure that it would. That said, there’s no question Red Right Hand spoils a thing or two from The Killing Kind, so it’s probably best to start at the beginning.
It’s funny; a number of reviews have mentioned I’m writing a trilogy, but I’ve always intended the Hendricks books to be an open-ended series. Could be all this trilogy talk stems from the fact that my last series was a trilogy—but between you, me, and the internet, I thought that one was open-ended too, until my old publisher told me they weren’t interested in publishing another one.

SP: Michael Hendricks, the main character of Red Right Hand, is clearly an anti-hero. He’s essentially a hit man who goes after hit men, and while he is certainly not evil, he’s not exactly walking around with a heart of gold either. Yet it is this dark edge that makes him so attractive to readers. Why do you think readers like an anti-hero? And are there even such things as “real” heroes?

CH: I believe that there are truly evil people in the world, and truly good, but the majority of us exist in the vast gray middle in between. It seems to me that part of the appeal of anti-heroes is that they allow us to safely explore our own dark impulses. Anti-heroes are a dare. A gut-check. A what-if.
I also think their unpredictability makes them interesting. Heroes, by definition, always act heroically—and you can count on mustache-twirling villains to be villainous. Anti-heroes, on the other hand, are harder to pin down. We read (or watch) to find out what they’ll do next.

SP: One of Red Right Hand’s many strengths is its fast, uncompromising pace. From a craft perspective, how did you maintain the intensity and pace without sacrificing any of the story?

CH: Honestly? Copious editing. My first drafts are pretty bloated and uneven. I usually go through six or seven drafts before a book is done. Red Right Hand only took three, but damn if they weren’t brutal. Every scene streamlined. Every character deepened. Every action beat punched up. I kinda see it like those digital FX reels you see online. The first draft is the wireframe version. Every subsequent draft adds texture and context. Hopefully, by the time it hits the screen, it doesn’t look half-baked anymore.

SP: As I previously mentioned, Red Right Hand follows The Killing Kind. Did you write The Killing Kind knowing that the story would eventually become a series? And once you realized that you would be carrying Michael Hendricks’ story for the breadth of more than one novel, did you outline the series ahead of time?

CH: Is it weird to call your shot? Yeah, I always intended The Killing Kind to be the first in a series. That said, I’m incapable of outlining. I’ve got a rough idea of a few big beats in my head, but that’s about it. When it comes to finding out what happens next, I’m six months ahead of my readers at most.

SP: And just to spread the love, as I always like to do, who would you say is currently writing at the top of the crime-fiction genre? Who or what novels would you recommend for fans of your work who are hungry for more?

CH: Lou Berney’s TheLong and Faraway Gone is as beautiful a crime novel as you’ll ever read. Megan Abbott’s You Will Know Me continues her already impressive literary hot streak. Stuart Neville’s Those We Left Behind was absolutely devastating, so I can’t wait to dig into his new one. Ditto Michael Koryta’s Last Words. And I’m in the middle of a gritty, lyrical Florida crime novel by Steph Post called Lightwood that’ll be out early next year.
Okay, I'm not going to pretend that didn't make me smile... But back to Chris Holm. Be sure to check out both Red Right Hand and The Killing Kind, as well as Holm's Collector series (which have amazing covers, by the way) And always, read, review and repeat. Cheers!


Tuesday, October 4, 2016

The Great Summer Book Bite!

Okay, so it might not be summer for many of you, but here in Florida, it's summer until January. So this post is technically still very relevant...

In short, the past few months were taken up with writing, writing, writing and although I read quite a bit as well, I neglected the Book Bites feature I'd really been enjoying.

Without further excuses, therefore, I bring you 11 (my new favorite number...) of my recent favorite reads. Cheers!
Lily and the Octopus
by Steven Rowley
(you can read my interview with the author here)
The Price of Salt
by Patricia Highsmith
The Blood of Heaven
by Kent Wascom
by Yaa Gyasi
The Painted Veil
by W. Somerset Maugham
Marrow Island
by Alexis M. Smith
(you can read my interview with the author here)
No Man's Wild Laura
by Beth Gilstrap
(you can read my interview with the author here)
You Will Know Me
by Megan Abbott
In the Lake of the Woods
by Tim O'Brien
Just Kids
by Patti Smith
Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely
by Matthew Fogarty
(you can read my interview with the author here)

Monday, September 19, 2016

Bouchercon 2016!

I just got back into town from Bouchercon and while I'm still in recovery mode from the whirlwind trip (and busy eating everything in sight- New Orleans is a city with amazing food, but it's not very friendly to gluten-free vegetarians... ), I'd be remiss if I didn't reflect and re-cap  just a little.

This past week was a collection of firsts for me:

-First Bouchercon (ever)

-First major author event of this scale

-First time seeing/holding/trying to bite my advance copies of Lightwood

-First time meeting my amazing new publisher Jason Pinter who, incidentally, had ARCs of Lightwood in his hands when we first said hello

-First Noir at the Bar, hosted by the incredible Eric Beetner

-First panel where I was able to finally talk about Lightwood

-First group signing with Polis Books

-First time meeting, in person, so many people and authors whom I love and admire. With some of you I was able to finally to have those long conversations, for others, it might have only been a hug and a hello, but it meant so much as well. Can't wait until the next time...

So, who's ready for Toronto in 2017?

(For more pictures, check out my Bouchercon Peeps album on Facebook. Unfortunately, I usually get caught up in the moment and forget to take pictures.... so- many, many thanks to my husband for remembering!)

Monday, September 12, 2016


Heading to Bouchercon this week? Me too! Here's a few places where you can find me....

Wednesday (9/14)- Noir at the Bar, Gallery 6, 4:30-6:00pm
Saturday (9/17)- Panel: "On the Other Side of the World", Mardi Gras FG, 12:00-12:50pm
Saturday (9/17)- Signing with Polis Authors, Book Room, 1:00-2:00pm

*PLUS, Polis will be giving away free galleys (while supplies last) of Lightwood on Saturday!*


Saturday, September 10, 2016

Strange Magic: An Interview with Matthew Fogarty, author of Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely

Today, I'm super excited to bring you an interview with Matthew Fogarty, author of the brilliant short story collection (with novella), Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely. This is one of the best collections I've ready all year and I've been anxiously awaiting its debut on September 16th, so that I can share it with the rest of the world. Enjoy!

Steph Post: Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely is like a love letter to childhood. The stories are rife with totemic childhood hallmarks: robots, mermaids, pirates, monsters, videogame characters, cowboys, astronauts, the list goes on... Opening this collection is like opening a treasure chest containing everything we ever wanted to be when we grew up (before we became jaded and realized that no, we were probably not going to grow fins). What gave you the inspiration for tapping into and channeling the idealized (and also real) experiences of childhood?

Matthew Fogarty: Oh wow, thank you. Yeah, I'm not sure where to begin answering this question.

The collection really started as an experiment with freeing myself up to write anything and, more specifically, to write the kinds of stories I like to read. Entering the second year of my MFA, I was feeling aimless (in a bad way) with my fiction—I’d been trying to write the kinds of “serious” and intensely adult stories I thought I needed to write, but everything was coming out flat and emotionless and well-worn; I hated the characters I was writing. And so I experimented with removing any sense of responsibility or any “supposed to” and just freed myself up to write and explore and have fun. And, thinking only that I wanted to write something involving a robot and a love story, I wrote the title piece.

And maybe that’s the connection to childhood, this release from responsibility and this opening up of possibilities. I was obsessed with the idea of childlike wonder. I wanted the chance, in my writing, to let the world be wondrous and exciting and new again. After a while, I also became obsessed with the idea of nostalgia for a time or a place or a thing that never existed. I’d been revisiting the movies of John Hughes and thinking about how they seemed to so perfectly capture my childhood and young adulthood, but how the worlds they depict weren’t real or realistic even when the movies were first released.

Maybe it all has something to do with growing up in the suburbs of Detroit and the weirdness and strange magic of that space: that it’s neither city nor country, that it’s this bizarrely “un” place. Which, as a kid, felt blank or boring or generic, but now, looking back, feels unique and magical. That within our square-mile subdivision we had a park and a river (really, a creek) and a block of trees that felt at the time, and still does, like an endless, boundaryless forest in which all manner of things are possible.

SP: Because some of these stories are so delightfully wild, I'm interested in your story-creation process. Do you sit around and just ask yourself "what if" questions? As in, "well, what if a mermaid and robot fell in love?" or, "what if Bigfoot needed a temp job?" Do these ideas hit you like a bolt of lightening while driving down the road or are they highly developed?

MF: A little of all of those, I'd say. Many started with an inkling or an emotion or a word or a line or a sound and grew from there. The hardest work was letting myself follow them into the weird. At a certain point, I realized many of the stories I was writing involved characters that were almost legendary or mythological, but in some way distinctly American, characters that I'd grown up with and that helped form my understanding of the world. From there, I identified a bunch of other characters that felt like they deserved a story, characters I could throw into situations I wanted to explore or that I could pair with an emotion or an idea.

Some stories are premise-based what-ifs, but I find those stories to be toughest just because, at least until I dive deeply into them, I feel like I'm floundering and awkward and aimless, hoping to find my role in the telling of the story. For example, I knew I wanted to write something involving a zombie theme park. It took two years of actively and passively thinking about it, and living with it and letting it germinate, to develop it into an actual story idea. Even then, there were maybe a dozen or so false starts—me trying to write into the story or write through the story or write around the story, trying to approach it from various angles and pull on some of the strings I developed and all of it failing to gain any momentum. And then one day I found the voice, the tone of the narration, and I had it—three weeks later I had most of a first draft.

SP: The sections in the collection are broken down and titled with prepositions: Under, over, between, above, away. What was the reasoning for the section breakdowns and what is the meaning behind the titles?

MF: Let me say first, structuring a flash collection is maybe the hardest part of writing a flash collection. And in this case, many of these ideas are actually credited to the folks at Stillhouse and, in particular, my wonderful editor, Justin Lafreniere. Originally, I had thought of all of the stories as little rivers or creeks that all empty into the novella, which collects everything thematically and plotwise and plays with it all some more and twists things and so on. It's how Etgar Keret and Stuart Dybek structure many of their collections.

But Justin made some keen observations: for one, given the length of the collection and the sheer number of stories, it was hard to maintain any kind of readerly momentum or to make any real sense out of the collection as a whole without any signposts of some sort; for another, the stories play in so many different worlds, there needed to be something to help them cohere. He suggested grouping the stories into a few sections with the novella in the middle. Eventually, we struck on the idea of how these stories relate to each other in space. I came up with loose groupings of stories and Justin took the idea back to his editorial team. Together, we came up with the order.

Originally, I was firmly opposed to section titles. I like to let my work speak for itself and I didn't want to ruin the way the stories were naturally kind of working off each other. But Justin pushed me to make it work, and I settled on the prepositions. Maybe initially they were an attempt to be cute, but the more I lived with them and read and reread the collection throughout the editing process, the more I've come to love the way they both provide some coherence among the stories in the book while also challenging some of the stories and driving them perhaps deeper than I ever could have intended.

SP: Many of the stories have a fairy tale or allegorical type structure. I'm thinking especially in the novella "The Dead Dream of Being Undead," but also in shorter works such as the title story. Were you influced by allegories directly or is this a reflection of the overall theme of childhood, as most often it is children who are exposed to this style of storytelling?

MF: In one sense, I think it’s a storytelling strategy. There’s something so unequivocally firm about the allegorical or fable-like telling, something we so readily accept as truthful on some figurative level. And I love testing the limits of this, of exploring how readily we might accept something presented in that style or how long we might choose to stay with something that begins to deviate or expand or transmorph out of that old fablelike telling into something wholly, magically, wondrously different. I like Borges and Calvino a lot, and they were masters of this.

Another thought as I was working on the collection was that there were so many stories or ideas or characters floating around in my memory that seemed like they were real, like they already existed on paper or in a book, like they were firm and well-worn. I feel like I remember stories about mermaids and robots and astronauts flying to the moon in a barrel. But of course I don’t remember those stories, my memory is faulty, it’s swirled all these ideas, these little pieces of culture and history and geography and so on into some weird false fairyland. I don’t know if others have this same experience or if they experience these false memories of iconic or legendary characters the same way I do. But I want to tell those stories, to make them firm, to make them as real as the mythologies I remember.

SP: In many of my favorite stories, a single image or object is focused on as a way to convey "unspeakable" emotions. I'm thinking of the chair in "River to Shanghai" or the cooler in "Plain Burial." Bigfoot's overcoat. Was this a conscious decision- to use objects to express emotions?

MF: This is also a storytelling strategy, I guess. I'm not sure how consciously I deploy it. It's always kind of a happy accident, whether the story grew naturally out of a particular object or an object just happens to show up in a story. Once I get past that initial creative burst of WHOOSH that splatters the start of a story on the page and the actual real work begins, I begin to see objects as things I can work with and out of which I can tease more story and more ideas.

I don't say this in relation to my own work, but it's one of the things I love in fiction and in storytelling generally—the idea of using an object as both a focal point that concentrates the reader's or the audience's attention and as a tool of distraction or misdirection. Aaron Sorkin does it. David Mamet does it. Stuart Dybek does it. Etgar Keret has a number of stories that center the reader's attention on an object. Aimee Bender does it often. Caitlin McGuire does it. It's a cool dramatic and rhetorical trick that I try to get my students to do in essay writing, as well.

SP: I noticed that many of the stories highlight the landscape or natural elements. Water in particular, but also the earth itself, seems to play a keen role in explore the relationship between character. This is most evident in my favorite piece (and it took a while to decide how to use the word 'favorite' there)- "We Are Swimmers." Do you think that your emphasis on nature harkens again back to the themes of childhood and how children experience the world?

MF: Yeah, that's definitely true. I think, more than just childhood and children in general, it has to do with growing up in the suburbs and my childhood in particular. My understanding and experience of nature was formed in this weird in-between space, where elements of the city and the industrial blend with elements of the country and the natural. Something went awry in that blending, and we ended up with a space that was not quite city, not quite country, a space that was simply "un." And I should add that these aren't my ideas at all, that there are plenty others who've written about this, including Stewart O'Nan in Last Night at the Lobster, which is a fantastic book set in a Red Lobster that's about to close but is enduring a snowstorm.

And I guess, more literally, much of the landscape here is the landscape of my childhood in the suburbs of Detroit: the crumbling industrial center, the relatively affluent and green suburbs, the majesty of the great lakes. My grandmother lived in a cottage on a hill on the Canadian side of Lake Erie near Buffalo. That house, which was ramshackle and threatening to fall into the drink but nonetheless magical, and that beach, which often overtaken by rotting seaweed but nonetheless beautiful, are where my sisters and I had our most awesome adventures.

SP: To wrap up, I say that we end on love. Although there are heartbreaking moments in these stories, there is a pervading sense of buoyancy. A steadfast belief in hope that is refreshing, perhaps because it is so absent in much of modern literature. There is a purity in the way you convey love, no more so than in "Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely." The whole time I was reading this story, I was waiting for the crushing ending, the expected 'we can't have what we want because we're all different and life sucks' ending, but instead, the story closes with the belief in the power of love. It's not cheesy. It's not sappy. It's honest and hopeful and shocking, because it dares to be so pure. Do you think these themes and types of stories are missing from the contemporary lit landscape? Do you think they are needed? And were you deliberately treading on this ground or is this more a reflection of the way you personally experience the world?

MF: I don't know. I'm not sure how to think of myself in relation to the contemporary lit landscape and I really don't feel like any kind of authority on what types of stories we do and don't need. Certainly, as far as the contemporary lit landscape goes, we don't necessarily need another straight white dude writer from the suburbs. There are plenty of us out there and all the stories of that generic experience have been pretty well told by writers who are better at writing than I am. But I do know that I love to write, that there are elements of how I've experienced the world that are both singular to me and also, on some level, touch on ideas or themes or emotions that we all experience in our own ways. There are stories out there that feel like they should exist but don't. And so I write and all I can write, all I can ever hope to write, are the stories only I can write, the stories that reflect my unique and subjective experience of the world.

It's inevitable in all this that I end up writing the types of stories that I like to read. So do I wish there were more stories like that? Of course. Absolutely. I wish there were more happy stories that explore the joy and whimsy in the world. I wish there were more stories that explore emotions other than devastation and longing. But not everyone is so fortunate as to spend their time doing that. There's ugly and there's hatred in the world. Certainly, there's truth and understanding and empathy to be found in stories that plumb those depths. There are plenty of voices writing into and around experiences of those depths—voices that are bolder and more important than mine.

I sometimes feel limited in my capacity to fight back the ugly and the hatred and the evil. It's a feeling that happens often when I sit down to write or, more often, when I decide there's no reason to sit down to write. And I don't know the answer and, again, this is just me and my thoughts. And I don't mean any of this as naively as it may sound. But I think there's some value in those times, that one other way to fight back the bad is to make something beautiful, to add to the beauty in the world. My work doesn't always live up to that lofty goal, but maybe there's something of merit in the trying.

"Maybe Mermaids" is one of those stories. I don't know if all of this was in my mind as I wrote it. Rather, it was me just letting myself write whatever I wanted, whatever felt real to me, whatever felt like mine. When I was a kid, my parents kept boxes full of books—children's books, mostly, and encyclopedias and school books—in our basement and during tornado warnings, we'd all go down to the basement and read. As an adult, I'm struck by how prominent and happy those afternoons are in my memory even though I know they can't have happened more than once every couple of years. But I wanted to write one of those stories, one of the stories I'd read in a children's book or an encyclopedia or a science book and what came out was a little bit of all of those things.

Thanks so much to Matt Fogarty for fielding my relentless questions and for bringing Maybe Mermaids and Robots are Lonely into the world. Be sure to pick up your copy on September 16th! It will be worth it; I promise.

Friday, September 9, 2016

A Conversation with Nature... (and Marrow Island author Alexis M. Smith)

This week, I'm excited to bring you an interview with Alexis M. Smith, author of Marrow Island, a haunting tale of love, loss and discovery in the wilds of the Pacific Northwest. Read on!

Steph Post: Lucie’s story in Marrow Island is told back and forth across time with chapters alternating between 2016 and 2014. In this way, we slowly learn of the traumatic events that happened in the past, while the story simultaneously moves forward with the repercussions of those events. It’s an interesting structural technique and one that reminds me a little of Evie Wyld’s All the Birds, Singing. To create these dual narratives in time, did you write each separately and then weave them together or did you write straight through, flipping back and forth in your own mind as you wrote?

Alexis Smith: I loved All the Birds, Singing! I was struck by her use of time as structure as well (though I read it after I had finished Marrow Island).

When I began writing I thought that I would write the story linearly (beginning with her return to the islands, moving through her experiences there, then moving on to the woods and the aftermath). As it turns out, I get bored by linear narratives. I couldn’t sustain it. My mind was skipping ahead, then looking back, almost constantly. So I just started writing the chapters as you read them. There was more joy in writing back and forth like that, even if it did take more concentration not to reveal too much, too soon.

SP: While Marrow Island focuses heavily on Lucie’s introspection and her relationships with her boyfriend Carey and childhood friend Katie, there is a lot of natural science going on in both narratives. Marrow Island is home to an eco-colony whose members are focused on healing the island, mainly by means of reviving the soil with mushrooms. Are the scientific practices used by the colony members real? While researching, did you ever visit a place like the colony you describe?

AS: Yes! Mycoremediation is a real thing. My deployment of it in the novel is pure fantasy, though. As far as I know, no one has tried it on such a large scale.

I didn’t visit any eco-communes or intentional communities, or, indeed, any mushroom farms or mycoremediation sites. I read a lot, watched videos, interviewed people, and became an amateur mycologist. I spend a lot of time out in the woods, and just walking around the city observing urban flora and fauna, so I took lots of pictures on my phone of mushrooms I encountered in the world, then I came home to my field guides and mushroom forums online and identified what I had seen. It’s an obsession I haven’t given up. If you follow me on Instagram you’ll likely still see a mushroom every now and then.

SP: Marrow and Orwell Island are located in Washington and Malheur National Forest, where Lucie lives in 2016, is located in Oregon. In both places, Lucie falls for the lushness of the natural world around her. How important is the Pacific Northwest setting to the story itself?

AS: Stories very often arise from landscapes for me. Whether it’s the Pacific Northwest, where I was born and have lived most of my life, or New Mexico, where my mom has lived for the last fifteen years, the stories are there and I’m open to them. It’s a sort of conversation with the natural world that I’ve been having since I was a little kid, playing in the woods outside my grandparents’ homestead in Alaska.

SP: Without going into detail, I’ll just say that the novel ends with a terrifyingly gorgeous, image-heavy scene. Did you have this particular scene in mind when you started Marrow Island? It carries such a weight and I could see it guiding the narrative instead of being only a conclusion.

AS: I envisioned that scenario as the ending, yes—it was definitely a guide for me throughout the book—though I didn’t know exactly what Lucie would do in that scene, or what the final image and words would be. I like to keep an ending in mind as I write, so that I know where I’m going. To your previous question: this scene was inspired by a solo road trip through southern Oregon, during a thunder storm. I was maybe fifty pages into the novel at that point, and felt adrift. I was plugging along but without momentum. Driving alone through the Siskiyou National Forest on a stormy spring brought out that scene. This might be my only useful writing advice: when you’re not sure where your story’s going, get to the woods.

SP: In many ways, Marrow Island is a tale of loss. Lost love, lost trust, lost land. Especially in regards to the island itself, and the damage it sustained in an oil refinery explosion, the wounds you explore in the novel don’t seem to heal. Is there a message of hope here as well? Does there have to be?

AS: Oh, good question…

Hope is such a tricky concept for me. I go back and forth: sometimes I have hope that humans will get their shit together and stop killing each other and the planet; other days, the only hope I see is in the persistence of species other than our own, the ability of, say, mycelia to communicate with trees, or protect bees from colony colapse. Ultimately, I want there to be an end to the greed that is causing so much suffering, and I see so many examples of flawed but beautiful human beings doing their best to learn from time spent in contemplation of the natural world around us. Right now my heart is with the people of Standing Rock, facing down dogs and bulldozers and corporate power. They give me hope. The Marrow colonists are meant to give hope, too, I guess, however stacked the odds against them.

Thanks to Alexis M. Smith for stopping by! Be sure to check out Marrow Island, as well as Smith's first novel, Glaciers. Happy Reading!